Difference between revisions of "Talk:Custom Track Jam"
(→Tracks Without Articles: new section) |
(Brought up legibility issues with series 2 history) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
By the way, yes, I notified Billy about this on the last day of May; he never responded. I want to see what others have to say. --[[User:KantoEpic|KantoEpic]] ([[User talk:KantoEpic|talk]]) 02:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC) | By the way, yes, I notified Billy about this on the last day of May; he never responded. I want to see what others have to say. --[[User:KantoEpic|KantoEpic]] ([[User talk:KantoEpic|talk]]) 02:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Legibility issues == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi, I see that the tables in the "Series 2 History" subsection are not the most legible. Here's the example of a header: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="textbox cyan headline" | ||
| + | |+ Series 2 Season 2 Jam 2: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlLNyFJ0JuE Swamp] | ||
| + | ! Place | ||
| + | ! Track | ||
| + | ! Author | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! filler | ||
| + | | text filler text filler text filler text | ||
| + | | filler text filler text | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The theme of the Jam (which I think it's a fairly important piece of information) is written in blue on a blue background. I understand that the blue background is linked to the color scheme for series 2, but I think something like this would be better: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="textbox cyan headline" | ||
| + | |+ Series 2 Season 2 Jam 2: Swamp [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlLNyFJ0JuE (video)] | ||
| + | ! Place | ||
| + | ! Track | ||
| + | ! Author | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! filler | ||
| + | | text filler text filler text filler text | ||
| + | | filler text filler text | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Or better yet: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="textbox cyan headline" | ||
| + | |+ Series 2 Season 2 Jam 2: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlLNyFJ0JuE <span style="color:white">Swamp</span>] | ||
| + | ! Place | ||
| + | ! Track | ||
| + | ! Author | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! filler | ||
| + | | text filler text filler text filler text | ||
| + | | filler text filler text | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Or maybe even: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="textbox cyan headline" | ||
| + | |+ [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlLNyFJ0JuE <span style="color:white">Series 2 Season 2 Jam 2: Swamp</span>] | ||
| + | ! Place | ||
| + | ! Track | ||
| + | ! Author | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! filler | ||
| + | | text filler text filler text filler text | ||
| + | | filler text filler text | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you think any of these solutions is a good idea, feel free to implement it. I didn't want to do it myself before discussing here first. -- [[User:Cealgair|Cealgair]] ([[User talk:Cealgair|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cealgair|contribs]]) 21:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:16, 7 November 2021
Tracks Without Articles
I still do not see the reason why these tracks are locked behind a Discord server that is not private, which can be accessed by anyone – even a dummy Discord account by entering a username can access it just fine, meaning that the files are not even private in the first place. I completely understand that most tracks are not finished and the authors know that they could be a lot better due to how these contests work. However, the Discord server does not only have handful of friends and no one else; there are over 100 people within it (including me). I do not think making this server inaccessible to the general public would work. This is not because I am against privacy or anything like that – look at what the Internet has become these days – but I like how more people would want to join in on these contests and have their fun. I just feel like the tracks should get their own articles at this point.
By the way, yes, I notified Billy about this on the last day of May; he never responded. I want to see what others have to say. --KantoEpic (talk) 02:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Legibility issues
Hi, I see that the tables in the "Series 2 History" subsection are not the most legible. Here's the example of a header:
| Place | Track | Author |
|---|---|---|
| filler | text filler text filler text filler text | filler text filler text |
The theme of the Jam (which I think it's a fairly important piece of information) is written in blue on a blue background. I understand that the blue background is linked to the color scheme for series 2, but I think something like this would be better:
| Place | Track | Author |
|---|---|---|
| filler | text filler text filler text filler text | filler text filler text |
Or better yet:
| Place | Track | Author |
|---|---|---|
| filler | text filler text filler text filler text | filler text filler text |
Or maybe even:
| Place | Track | Author |
|---|---|---|
| filler | text filler text filler text filler text | filler text filler text |
If you think any of these solutions is a good idea, feel free to implement it. I didn't want to do it myself before discussing here first. -- Cealgair (talk|contribs) 21:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)