Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boomerang Lake"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Wg93589 moved page Talk:Nike Track to Talk:Boomerang Lake: Jefe suggested that I don't use a companys name he suggested Boomerang Lake which it has been changed to) |
(→Name Discussion: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I wouldn't use the name of a company as huge and ruthless as Nike's for a CT - it's better to avoid the possibility of a cease and desist letter if you can. I'd suggest a different name, such as Boomerang Lake. --[[User:Jefe|Jefe]] ([[User talk:Jefe|talk]]) 06:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC) | I wouldn't use the name of a company as huge and ruthless as Nike's for a CT - it's better to avoid the possibility of a cease and desist letter if you can. I'd suggest a different name, such as Boomerang Lake. --[[User:Jefe|Jefe]] ([[User talk:Jefe|talk]]) 06:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Name Discussion == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I wouldn't use the name of a company as huge and ruthless as Nike's for a CT - it's better to avoid the possibility of a cease and desist letter if you can. I'd suggest a different name, such as Boomerang Lake. --[[User:Jefe|Jefe]] ([[User talk:Jefe|talk]]) 06:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Thanks for the input the name has been changed to what you suggested, Boomerang Lake. | ||
| + | :--[[wg93589]] ([[User talk:wg93589|talk]]), 7 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:41, 8 August 2015
I wouldn't use the name of a company as huge and ruthless as Nike's for a CT - it's better to avoid the possibility of a cease and desist letter if you can. I'd suggest a different name, such as Boomerang Lake. --Jefe (talk) 06:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Name Discussion
I wouldn't use the name of a company as huge and ruthless as Nike's for a CT - it's better to avoid the possibility of a cease and desist letter if you can. I'd suggest a different name, such as Boomerang Lake. --Jefe (talk) 06:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)