Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assembly Code"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Content Restrictions Violation: reply) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: My best guess is that it was from the Wii NDK, however I don't think that the exact origin is that important. It's clearly labeled, "Not to be redistributed", "Confidential", "Preliminary", "BM Confidential—Available Under NDA Only." | :: My best guess is that it was from the Wii NDK, however I don't think that the exact origin is that important. It's clearly labeled, "Not to be redistributed", "Confidential", "Preliminary", "BM Confidential—Available Under NDA Only." | ||
:: [[User:Riidefi|Riidefi]] ([[User talk:Riidefi|talk]]) 20:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC) | :: [[User:Riidefi|Riidefi]] ([[User talk:Riidefi|talk]]) 20:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::: So it is. [[User:Chadderz|Chadderz]] ([[User talk:Chadderz|talk]]) 21:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:57, 17 September 2017
Content Restrictions Violation
I do not believe that posting a link to the IBM Broadway RISC Microprocessor User Manual is allowed, as it violates the Content Restrictions rule 2. Riidefi (talk) 17:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps so, yes. The rule is worded a little poorly (almost everything is 'copyrighted') but clearly the implication is material that's copyrighted and the leaked/shared illegally. I must admit I've no idea as to the origin of the manual, if it was never legally shared then it would need to be removed, yes.
- Chadderz (talk) 19:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)