Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assembly Code"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Content Restrictions Violation == I do not believe that posting a link to the IBM Broadway RISC Microprocessor User Manual is allowed, as it violates the Content Restrictio...") |
(→Content Restrictions Violation: reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I do not believe that posting a link to the IBM Broadway RISC Microprocessor User Manual is allowed, as it violates the Content Restrictions rule 2. | I do not believe that posting a link to the IBM Broadway RISC Microprocessor User Manual is allowed, as it violates the Content Restrictions rule 2. | ||
[[User:Riidefi|Riidefi]] ([[User talk:Riidefi|talk]]) 17:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC) | [[User:Riidefi|Riidefi]] ([[User talk:Riidefi|talk]]) 17:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Perhaps so, yes. The rule is worded a little poorly (almost everything is 'copyrighted') but clearly the implication is material that's copyrighted and the leaked/shared illegally. I must admit I've no idea as to the origin of the manual, if it was never legally shared then it would need to be removed, yes. | ||
| + | : [[User:Chadderz|Chadderz]] ([[User talk:Chadderz|talk]]) 19:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:41, 17 September 2017
Content Restrictions Violation
I do not believe that posting a link to the IBM Broadway RISC Microprocessor User Manual is allowed, as it violates the Content Restrictions rule 2. Riidefi (talk) 17:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps so, yes. The rule is worded a little poorly (almost everything is 'copyrighted') but clearly the implication is material that's copyrighted and the leaked/shared illegally. I must admit I've no idea as to the origin of the manual, if it was never legally shared then it would need to be removed, yes.
- Chadderz (talk) 19:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)