Talk:MP9 Toad Road

From Custom Mario Kart
Jump to: navigation, search

Remake?

Someone should remake this in the final/released version of the board. It would be sick. FancyDoesCustomTracks (talk) 00:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)


Prefix MP9

Really?

Ok, the map idea is based of an MP9 mini game (I think so, never played it), but is MP9 really a new class of retro tracks? At the other hand I know, that the planned name is "Toad Road" and not "MP9 Toad Road".

-- Wiimm (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

MP9 is not a new retro track class, but a game prefix, which is in the title of every track here that is based on a track from another game.
--maczkopeti (talk) 18:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Is it "based on a track from another game", or only "optics are based on another game" (without track)?
Are there really racing tracks in MP9?
-- Wiimm (talk) 19:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
This is quite clearly a port of the MP9 board, and not just a track taking elements from the said game. Whether or not the original model was intended for racing shouldn't matter in this case.
--maczkopeti (talk) 20:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
This means, that MP9 contains a racing track? (my 2. question of above)?
If not, it is not a port, but maybe an adaption of the area.
-- Wiimm (talk) 21:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
SM64 is not a racing game (well, with the exception of the slides and Koopa the Quick races) and the tracks ported/remade from there have the prefix. I've checked this track and yes, it's a port. I've compared with the original MP9 files (they use BRRES as well). —Atlas (talk) 21:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
This track is not a PORT it is a remake you can clearly see this here. http://mariopartylegacy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/nsmbboardmap.png
It uses most of the Mario Party 9 board layout but not the same model.
--Sniki (talk) 17:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
As I mentioned in the overview, it is a port of the beta version shown here.
--maczkopeti (talk) 18:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Oh excuse me, didn´t see the updated overview just this discussion and the more common normal board layout.
--Sniki (talk) 10:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
This last picture makes it clear. I also haven't noticed the article hints.
-- Wiimm (talk) 11:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)