Category talk:Stub

Is there any definition, what a "Stub" is? I asked, because Avenir marked many pages and some of them with video, download and distribution reference.

Wiimm (talk) 18:40, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

A stub is a small article (a few sentences; incomplete) that can be improved with more info/videos etc. HerbertMcHoover (talk) 19:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

So first, welcome back Wiimm !! Secondly, Hum for me, a Stub is what Herbert just said , thirdly why did I do these edits , Hum as you can see on my talk page someone told me to put the stub category on any page that no longer have any working DL so I did so , Fourthly , I must admit that I've been too exessive on my edits and I made some mistakes like putting pages on stub category as long as the link does not links directly to a SZS ect... so yeah then I'm sorry if I'm giving you some hard work , good luck ! BTW I agree with the fact that the definition of stub can be confusing. Avenir (talk) 19:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

I know what technical a "stub" means and if you look into the history, you see, that I created this category. The better question is:

• What are the conditions to mark an article as "stub"?

Or some other questions to see what I mean:

• Is an article with minimal description, video and download link a stub?
• Should we have a second category "Incomplete", "Minimal" or "Super Stub" for articles without real content?

Wiimm (talk) 19:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

For articles with a minimal description, I'd say it's a stub. If it lacks a video and has a download link, I think it should be incomplete. If it's both, it's both a stub and incomplete. I don't think minimal or super stubs categories are necessary. HerbertMcHoover (talk) 20:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)